) for 5min with magnetic stirring under

24h standard ambient conditions (23 ± 2°C and 50 ± 5% relative humidity, ISO Dabrafenib mw 554-1976). Particle sizes were measured in the baths after the exhaustion treatment and in the baths after the first and third washings as described for the initial formulations. 2.4. In Vitro Percutaneous Absorption Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical Experiments (Franz Diffusion Cells) For these studies, pig skin was used from the unboiled backs of large white/Landrace pigs weighing 30–40kg. The pig skin was provided by the Clínic Hospital of Barcelona, Spain. After excision, the skin was dermatomed to a thickness of approximately 500 ± 50μm with a Dermatome GA630 (Aesculap, Germany). Skin discs with a 2.5cm Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical inner diameter were prepared and fitted into static Franz-type diffusion cells. Skin absorption studies were initiated by applying 10μL of Lip or MM (approximately 70μg/cm2GA) or by applying the fabrics treated with the same Lip or MM (containing approximately 150–250μg/cm2GA) onto the skin surface. Between the textile and the skin, 20μL of distilled Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical water was added to ensure close contact. A control skin disc (without product application on the skin surface) was used to rule out possible interferences in the analysis of GA by HPLC-UV. According to the OECD methodology [20], the skin penetration studies were performed for 24h of close contact between the textile and the skin. To increase the contact pressure between

the textile Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical fabric and skin, permeation experiments were also carried out by placing a steel cylinder on the textile-skin substrate at a constant pressure in accordance with standard conditions (125g/cm2) (ISO 105-E04, 1996) [21] (see Figure 1).

Figure 1 Diagram of in vitro percutaneous absorption experiments. After the exposure time, the receptor fluid was collected and brought to a volume of 5mL in a volumetric flask. In the case of the formulations, the skin surface was washed with a specific solution (500μL SLES (sodium lauryl ether sulphate) (0.5%) and twice with 500μL distilled Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical water) and dried with cotton swabs. In the case of the textiles, the fabrics were removed from the skin surface and collected together with the top of the cell. In both cases, after eliminating the excess GA from the skin surface, the stratum corneum of the skin was removed using mafosfamide adhesive tape (D-Squame, Cuderm Corporation, Dallas, TX, USA) applied under controlled pressure (80g/cm2 for 5sec). The epidermis was separated from the dermis after heating the skin to 80°C for five seconds. GA was extracted from the different samples (surface excess, CO/PA or skin layers) using a methanol:water (50:50) solution agitated in an ultrasonic bath for 30min at room temperature. The receptor fluids were directly analysed. After filtration on a Millex filter (0.22μm, Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA), the solutions containing GA were assessed by HPLC-UV. 2.5.