Figure options Download full-size image Download high-quality image (472 K) Download as PowerPoint slide Microhaps have an additional ability: qualitative identification of mixtures with the potential to quantify the components, i.e., to disentangle mixtures in a quantitative RG7420 solubility dmso way. If three or more different sequences are seen at sufficient numbers of reads at a microhap locus, the three alleles constitute evidence that DNA from more than one person

was present in the sample. The relative numbers of reads of the multiple sequences can quantitate the relative amounts of each sequence in the sample assuming sufficient reads for meaningful statistical analysis. With many loci multiplexed and with more loci consisting of three SNPs defining four or more haplotypes, the microhaps become powerful markers to identify and quantify components of mixtures. With allele (haplotype) frequencies defined in multiple populations, computer software should be able to accurately predict the likelihood and levels of mixture based on observing more than two sequence types at a locus and the numbers of Sirolimus mouse occurrences of each type. Ideally, before achieving status as a “final” microhap panel, ready for all routine applications, a microhap panel must consist of sufficient appropriate loci. These 31 loci were NOT selected for ancestry inference

or for individual identification irrespective of ancestry in the way that our previous SNP panels were. The STRUCTURE analyses (Supplemental Fig. S4) show that these 31 multiallelic loci are not as good as our 55 Ancestry Informative SNPs [12] for defining more than 5 groups of individuals. The difference is expected because these microhaps were not selected for high Fst among the populations. The selection was for high average heterozygosity Meloxicam as needed for kinship/lineage

inference. Fig. 4 illustrates two different patterns of variation seen among the 31 loci. The microhap at RXRA (Fig. 4a) has the lowest Fst of the 31 loci and illustrates a locus with extremely low Fst globally. This pattern is analogous to the individual identification panels of SNPs and would give similar levels of lineage information globally while providing little ancestry information. In contrast, the microhap at EDAR (Fig. 4b) has the lowest average heterozygosity and highest Fst with obvious information on population groupings. Because heterozygosity levels are low outside of Africa, the locus provides little individual identification or lineage information outside of Africa. This diversity of heterozygosity and allele frequency patterns among the loci and populations is reflected in the match probabilities illustrated in Fig. 2. They vary considerably among regions of the world in contrast to the greater uniformity in our individual identification panel [1] and [2].