No cases of rash illness including rubella, measles, or varicella were detected in passengers of this ship based on passive surveillance measures. The BCHD estimated a total cost of $67,000 spent on vaccinations, Copanlisib research buy supplies, and health department staff time (ie, excluding CDC and cruise line staff time) to interrupt transmission (Florida Department of Health, unpublished data, 2006). Although this outbreak occurred in 2006, CDC continued to receive reports of these VPD on cruise ships arriving at US ports; for example, during May 2006 to December 2010, 2 confirmed rubella cases and 1 suspect measles case, all among crew members, were reported to CDC (CDC, unpublished

data, 2010). Cruise travel continues to gain popularity, with a 7.2% annual average passenger growth rate in the North American cruise industry since 1990.[10] In 2009, 9.4 million of Thiazovivin research buy the 13.4 million cruise ship voyages worldwide were made by persons who resided in the United States, where Florida had the busiest ports.[10] Despite high levels of immunity to measles, rubella, and varicella among US residents,[11] clusters of some of these VPD on cruise ships originating

in the United States continue to occur.[3, 12] These clusters are often associated with the introduction and spread of VPD among susceptible crew members from countries with differing epidemiology of disease (ie, varicella), with low immunization rates, or that have not introduced or just recently introduced the vaccine and have ongoing disease transmission. The semi-enclosed, densely populated environment of cruise ships has been documented to facilitate

person-to-person transmission of communicable diseases, including VPD such as rubella and varicella.[3, 12, 13] The clusters of VPD on this cruise ship resulted from an imported case of rubella from the Philippines, an imported case of measles from Ukraine, and a varicella Tenofovir mw case of unknown source country, demonstrating the potential for exposure to diseases during cruise travel, which may be more common in developing countries without routine vaccination programs or continuing endemic transmission.[3, 4] The outbreak was confined to crew members, of whom less than 1% had proof of immunity to measles and rubella. Similarly, in a previous rubella outbreak investigation on cruise ships, approximately 85% of 366 crew members tested were born outside the United States (representing 50 countries), and 75% lacked proof of immunity to rubella. A serosurvey showed 4% of (366) crew members were acutely infected and 7% were susceptible to rubella.[3] Of 3,643 passengers surveyed 75% were US-born, 33% were of childbearing age, and 0.8% were pregnant. As with the investigation described in this report, although the immune status of passengers was not known, no transmission was detected among them.