90, se 0.07). However, model averaging
revealed that the 95% confidence intervals of all predictor variables included zero. Specifically, the effect of fire salamander on alpine salamander occupancy was rather small and the 95% confidence interval widely overlapped zero (Table 3). Theory predicts that both abiotic factors and interspecific competition determine sharp range margins among species (Bridle & Vines, 2007). Empirical studies have generally confirmed the importance of both of these factor groups for the range margins of parapatric salamanders (Cimmaruta et al., 1999; Arif et al., 2007; Cunningham et al., 2009; Gifford & Kozak, 2012). As expected, we found that the two species had dissimilar species–habitat relationships in their contact zones. The ‘slope’ of a sampling site affected the occupancy probability of Salamandra AZD8055 order salamandra, while none of the habitat characteristics explained the occupancy probability of S. atra. Unexpectedly, BTK inhibitor we found no evidence for competition as the local presence or absence of one of the two species had no effect
on the occupancy probability of the other one at the same site. In previous studies, both positive and negative effects of slope on salamanders from North America were found (Diller & Wallace, 1996; Stoddard & Hayes, 2005), while some studies found no effect of slope (Welsh & Lind, 2002). Slope was shown to affect occurrence or abundance of larval S. salamandra (Baumgartner et al., 1999; Tanadini selleck et al., 2012).
Our results imply that slope positively affected the occupancy probability of S. salamandra (Table 3, Fig. 2). Both the terrestrial and the aquatic habitats are important for this species with stream characteristics being the more important of them (Ficetola et al., 2009, 2011; Manenti et al., 2009). Slope affects both the terrestrial and the stream habitat. Assuming that the stream characteristics are important (Manenti et al., 2009), an explanation could be that the effect of slope is caused by its influence on stream characteristics. This interpretation is supported by the fact that ‘pools’ were also in the top ranking models, even though the confidence interval of the parameter estimate included zero (Tables 2 and 3). One possible explanation is that the streams with limited slope were closer to the valley floor where human modification of streams is most intense (P. Werner, unpubl. data). Stream modifications are known to result in physical changes of stream and riparian characteristics and that are likely to negatively influence amphibian habitats (Hazell, Osborne & Lindenmayer, 2003). This will especially be the case if human modification of streams resulted in a loss of microhabitats, such as pools with lower current velocity that are important for fire salamander larvae (Thiesmeier & Schuhmacher, 1990; Baumgartner et al., 1999; but see Tanadini et al., 2012). In contrast to S. salamandra, none of the habitat predictors explained occupancy probability of S. atra.